Why I no longer hate Wikipedia.

Wikipedia continues to grow in popularity and scope.  My interactions with Wikipedia have been nothing but frustrating, I don't trust the content and simple additions I try to make like coworking (which should have a page) get removed for no known reason by undemocratic self important uberdweebs.  The attention that wiki scanner got in the past couple weeks made me aware firstly how naive everyday Internet users are and how wikipedia can serve as an fantastic way to study human nature and how the non-tech world interacts with Social powered media.

Everybody I've worked with in the last 12 months seems to have a new project their working on Alex Rudloff, Gavin Hall and Michael Rhing are working on something yet to be announced, Brian Alvey has Comicmix and a new art projectJason Calacanis thinks you'll love Mahalo Follow.  And now that the shameless link baiting is over let me announce Wikirage which I built over the weekend, a quick little Mashable with some exciting value add - taken from following the latest edits of Wikipedia.  Latest news quickly floats to the surface as events are updated and revised.   Check it out, give me your feedback.

UPDATE 2007-08-29: I've added an RSS Feed.  Let me know if there are different things you'd like to see in the feed.

UPDATE 2007-09-04: If you want to contact me directly, please email me at craig dot wood at NOSPAM gmail dot com.

Comments (47)

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed.

Reply
Thomas (12:33 AM on Wed Aug 29, 2007)

Great work, Craig. It's interesting to look at popular topics. And it reminds me of just how out of touch I am with pop culture.

Reply
Celly (9:51 AM on Wed Aug 29, 2007)

Thats a freaking rad domain.

Reply
Craig Wood (12:22 PM on Wed Aug 29, 2007)

Thanks, I often get frustrated when looking for domains and start bitching about squatters, then when I find a good one it makes it that much more satisfying. If you can think of anything else I could do with the domain let me know.

Reply
Jim R. Wilson (1:29 PM on Wed Aug 29, 2007)

Hey Craig - that's a really slick tool! I'd like to chat with you regarding the possibility making an API for retrieving this information in a computer-readable format. Please feel free to email me. Thanks in advance.

Reply
Mo (9:33 PM on Wed Aug 29, 2007)

Hey that's pretty cool. RSS a pobssibility?

Reply
Craig Wood (1:19 AM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

OK, check out the RSS -- let me know what you thing.

Reply
Steve H. (11:14 PM on Wed Aug 29, 2007)

I second the compliments and requests of Jim Wilson and Mo. I'd love to see an RSS feed or some other form of machine-readable version of this info such that I could feed this data into another system I'm developing.

Also, a comment: # edits per unique user (by which I assume you mean a simple division) will highly rank pages where a single user is making a bunch of edits to a page, for example, as one might do when writing a new page. This may or may not be what you intend. I'd also love to see sorts based on alternative metrics like simply "most unique editors" within a given time span (which would elevate pages involved in more "widespread" controversy) and/or "most bytes changed" within a given time span (which would elevate pages where the most *content* is changing). In any event, what you've already done is extremely useful. Thanks!

Reply
Craig Wood (1:22 AM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

It actually is per unique editor over the time period. I am also only looking at major edits as defined by Wikipedia. Great suggestions here, I definitely give more options for users to get the metrics they find valuable, keep the ideas coming.

Reply
Anonymous (1:21 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

Good stuff, it would be nice to have a link to the page too.

Reply
Craig Wood (11:11 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

All the individual pages link to Wikipedia right below the summary.

Reply
Anonymous (2:29 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

The pronunciation key in the logo does not match the actual word. It looks like the pronunciation would be for a word like "wicka-ridge." Really, those pronunciation symbols mean something. Try taking a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Phonetic_Alphabet

Reply
Craig Wood (3:46 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

Really! I had no idea! The point was to be pretentious. I wouldn't put pronunciation tags in if I wasn't trying get people away from thinking wicky rage -- obviously that is how people will referrer to it.

Reply
Pip (8:53 AM on Wed Jan 7, 2009)

I don't understand, why would you purposefully include the incorrect pronunciation?

Reply
Craig Wood (9:00 AM on Wed Jan 7, 2009)

Because it is my made up word and I want it pronounced "wicka-ridge."

Reply
Haven (4:11 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

Could you give a brief summary of how this works? It seems like you would have to sort/parse a very large amount of data.

Reply
Girino (5:03 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

Is wikirage going to be available for wikipedia in other languages? Are you going to make it´s code open source?

Thanks,

Reply
Craig Wood (11:21 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

Great ideas, Thanks, I don't believe I will give out the source, but I will add an API for access to the data. I could definitely see adding in foreign language support.

Reply
Anonymous (6:23 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

Please link to the wikipedia pages too. Great work!

Reply
Anonymous (11:27 PM on Thu Aug 30, 2007)

This is sweet! Kudos.

Is there a straightforward way for one to monitor and filter (or flag) Wikipedia's Main Page Featured Articles? I'm sure the primary reason Houston, TX made the top of the list is because of the attention its Front-Page-Featured status attracted.
... and yes, I should get off my duff and figure out a solution myself... :-)

Reply
robl (9:48 AM on Fri Aug 31, 2007)

I love the idea - it works well. Could you us a little more about the dtasource you're using for the data, is it just polling a wikipedia page every x mins or something else ?

Reply
David Gerard (4:36 PM on Fri Aug 31, 2007)

Sorry the population of idiots (Wikipedia is on the Internet, so ...) put you off working on it directly. But we like this a lot - as with the WikiScanner, it's good to see someone using our information for more than just putting up a mirror site with Google ads. Are you using the recentchanges feed?

Reply
Magus (1:38 PM on Sun Sep 2, 2007)

Awesome idea, and some very unexpected pages coming up in there. (But that animation in the corner isn't really creative-commons licenced, is it? It's been around for years and that's just some wiki hotlinking it.)

Reply
Loran (5:37 AM on Mon Sep 3, 2007)

Really nice tool!
Would it be possible to have it for fr.wikipedia.org?

Reply
Craig Wood (1:56 PM on Tue Sep 4, 2007)

The french site is live http://fr.wikirage.com

Reply
Loran (3:46 PM on Tue Sep 4, 2007)

Excellent!!
Thanks

Reply
Anonymous (10:21 AM on Mon Sep 3, 2007)

I would appreciate spanish version.
good work. best regards.
Fer

Reply
Anonymous (11:48 AM on Tue Sep 4, 2007)

Great work, just a note, on french version, the link to full article links to english wikipedia.

Reply
Craig Wood (1:57 PM on Tue Sep 4, 2007)

Thanks for letting me know it has been fixed.

Reply
Anonymous (3:06 PM on Tue Sep 4, 2007)

Great idea and execution--bravo!
How about a RSS feed?

Reply
Anonymous (9:48 PM on Tue Sep 4, 2007)

Dear Craig Wood,

I'm writing this message on behalf of Yomiuri telecasting Corporation, one of Japanese local broadcasting companies.
I'd like to get permission from you in order to use your website. There's a TV program called "Asa para" (a variaty live show in the morning like "Today" and "Good Morning America."
In the program, top ten keywords searched within Japanese search engines "Yahoo! Japan" for the week are introduced, and "Wikirage," were ranked in second in this week.
Therefore, we'd like to show the Japanese website on pc for about 10 seconds in the TV program.
Since we have to prepare the materials by this Friday, I appreciate your quick responce for this matter.

Sincerely,

Reply
Craig Wood (10:03 PM on Tue Sep 4, 2007)

Unfortunately you didn't leave me your email address, but yes you have permission to show a screenshot of the wikirage website and mention the name. I would appreciate if you would contact me at craig dot wood at gmail dot com, and arrange to send me a recording of the program.

Reply
Ziggy (3:12 PM on Sat Sep 8, 2007)

Is there any way you could presnet a summary of all the data? Average edits, vandalism per edit, etc.? I'd like to use your site as a source for a paper I'm writing, and, frankly, I'm too lazy to total it up manually. I don't know how difficult this would be, so, if I'm putting you out, sorry. Besides, I think that that would just be cool anyway.

Reply
Anonymous (5:39 PM on Sun Sep 9, 2007)

It's be nice if you could show which items were recently on the front page of Wikipedia.

Reply
Craig Wood (11:02 PM on Sun Sep 9, 2007)

Yep, Wanna do that, also hoping to identify items that have been removed.

Reply
arnauld (11:22 AM on Tue Sep 11, 2007)

so so interesting what u did...thks wikirage

Reply
Ed Chi (6:06 PM on Tue Sep 11, 2007)

You guys might also be interested in http://wikidashboard.parc.com, which are dashboards that are added to every page, visualizing the editing patterns, top editors, and other statistics for each page, including user pages. We had just announced it.

Reply
Rik (1:01 PM on Tue Sep 25, 2007)

This is a incredible tool. Great work! Is there a way to configure wikirage to work with other wikis? Of course free is best. ;) But I'm doing research on wikis and would pay for this (not much . . . I'm just a poor grad student). I would imagine other researchers (and more nefarious types) will see the value of wikirage.

Reply
http://www.justshmooze.com (10:23 AM on Fri Jan 25, 2008)

website is down...

Reply
Moon Lucas (12:45 PM on Tue Feb 5, 2008)

VERY IMPRESSIVE, Mr. Wood!

Congrats to you!!

XO- M

Reply
MightFunk (5:17 PM on Sun May 11, 2008)

I'll tell you a good reason why we should all hate Wikipedia. Here's my experience with this piece of garbage website:

http://www.mightyfunk.com/2008/05/wikipedia-equals-fail-d...

Reply
John Smith (5:08 PM on Tue May 27, 2008)

Hi,
I really like your blog because I love wikipedia. I was wondering if you could blog about this widget I have here. It's a Wikipedia Search Bar for your blog.

thanks so much!
-John Smith

Reply
Wikimedia Sverige (9:19 AM on Sat Jun 7, 2008)

Really nice tool!
Would it be possible to have it for sv.wikipedia.org?

Reply
Bob Geller (1:24 PM on Thu Nov 20, 2008)

Is there a way to see new entries in Wikipedia? Or get a buzz index on terms people are searching on in Wikipedia?

Reply
AJ Cann (1:09 PM on Wed Jun 3, 2009)

Nice site but RSS feeds currently say "(title unknown)" - less than useful.

Reply
Reverson Entertainment (6:24 PM on Mon Oct 12, 2009)

Please delete the wikirage page for "Reverson Entertainment", as that information violates company rights. The editor that used this name on "wikipedia" had no right to use this copyrighted name.

Reply
Tony (5:29 PM on Thu Dec 17, 2009)

Awesome app, thanks. Would be even cooler if you could somehow also report on the pages that are getting the most traffic each hour/day/week.

Kudos!

Reply
qweasd (10:47 PM on Wed Aug 4, 2010)

cartier jewelry for the birthday gift? links of london jewellery Is the better way to service ur purpose I think. I don't recommended cartier jewelry for the reason that the 2nd jewellery is more famous than it. Or what about nfl jerseys? I mean u can do it for her bro~uh..just a joke, I think follow the mbt shoes tips can work out the whole thing. So, see u next time, wishes that I can see ur links of london jewellery next time! Cy!

Add a comment Cancel & reply to article ›

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. To create a clickable link, simply type the URL (including http://) and we will make a link for you. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags, but if you're into that kind of thing, you can use any of the following tags: b, i, strong, em, a (href only), p and br.

Click one of the three commenter types below. Member comments are added immediately once you confirm your email address. Anonymous comments are moderated by our editorial staff.

Email Me
  
Comment Preview
Avatar
Anonymous (3:48 PM on Thu Sep 2, 2010)

Preview your comment here.